Which step follows the internal review in the administrative rule-making process?

The step that follows internal review in the administrative rule-making process is external review. Internal review typically involves the initial assessment and refinement of proposed rules within an organization or agency. After this internal examination, it is essential to seek feedback from outside parties, which constitutes the external review phase.

During the external review, proposed rules may be shared with stakeholders, interest groups, and the general public to gather diverse perspectives and insights. This input is crucial as it helps identify any potential issues or gaps in the proposed rules, ensuring that they are robust and more effectively serve the needs of the community.

Engaging in external review also promotes transparency and accountability in the rule-making process, allowing the agency to consider the views and concerns of those who will be impacted by the rules. This feedback can significantly influence the final version of the proposed rules before they are officially adopted or implemented.