What is an example of paternalism in macro social work practice?

Paternalism in macro social work practice refers to an approach where one party makes decisions for another party, often with the belief that it is for the latter’s own good, sometimes disregarding their autonomy or input. The correct example provided illustrates this concept well, as it involves deliberately withholding information from community residents with the intention of protecting them or preventing them from making what is perceived as poor choices.

This approach can lead to significant ethical concerns, as it undermines the agency and empowerment of community members. Social work practice emphasizes collaboration, self-determination, and the importance of informed consent. Withholding information contradicts these principles, as it denies individuals the ability to make informed decisions about their own lives and circumstances.

The other options reflect more participatory and empowering approaches, which are fundamental in social work. Encouraging community members to voice their concerns allows for active participation and respects their agency. Implementing community decisions with stakeholder input supports democratic practices and values the perspectives of those affected. Providing full access to all community resources promotes equity and empowerment, enabling residents to make choices that serve their best interests.